Students’ Preferred Instructional Practices

Authors

  • Rosmalin G. Arzagon Notre Dame of Tacurong College Author
  • Melody A. Zaragoza Notre Dame of Tacurong College Author
  • Sherry V. Mecida Notre Dame of Tacurong College Author

Keywords:

Instructional, Practices, Student

Abstract

The main objective of this descriptive research was to find
out the students’ preferred instructional practices during the
global pandemic. The respondents were 308 students
coming from 11-course offerings enrolled during the first
semester of the academic year 2021-2022. The study was
conducted at Notre Dame of Tacurong College, Tacurong,
Sultan Kudarat Province, the Philippines. Findings showed
that the mean ratings of the eight items ranged from 2.64 to
6.24. Since ranking was used to determine the most and least
preferred instructional practices, the item with the least
mean rating is ranked 1, and the item with the highest mean
rating is ranked 8. Hence, the three most preferred
instructional practices are: Item 1, Assignments that ask
students to express what they have learned and what they
still need to learn, obtained the weighted mean of 2.64 (SD =
2.24) and interpreted as Strongly Preferred; Second is Item
3, Live sessions “zoom meetings” in which students can ask
questions and participate in discussions, got the weighted
mean of 3.31 (SD = 1.74) and interpreted as Preferred; and
the third is Item 2, Frequent quizzes or other assessments,
obtained a weighted mean of 3.44 (SD = 2.10) and
interpreted as Preferred.

Author Biographies

  • Rosmalin G. Arzagon, Notre Dame of Tacurong College

    Research Development Office

  • Melody A. Zaragoza, Notre Dame of Tacurong College

    Research Development Office

  • Sherry V. Mecida , Notre Dame of Tacurong College

    Research Development Office

References

Asriyanti, A., Septiani, T. D., Siagian, M. S. P., and Triawan, F. (2021). Portable coffin lowering

device for covid-19 corpse handling: Education, design process, and strength analysis.

Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 1(1), 41-54.

Azzahra, S., Maryanti, R., and Wulandary, V. (2022). Problems faced by elementary school

students in the online learning process during the Covid-19 pandemic. Indonesian Journal

of Multidiciplinary Research, 2(2), 245-256

Choi, B., Jegatheeswaran, L., Minocha, A., Alhilani, M., Nakhoul, M., and Mutengesa, E.

(2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on final year medical students in the

United Kingdom: a national survey. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-11.

Conklin, S., and Garrett Dikkers, A. (2021). Instructor social presence and connectedness in a

quick shift from face-to-face to online instruction. Online Learning, 25(1), 135-150.

Cookson, A., Kim, D., and Hartsell, T. (2020). Enhancing student achievement, engagement,

and satisfaction using animated instructional videos. International Journal of Information

and Communication Technology Education, 16(3), 113-125.

Doll, K., Ragan, M., and Calnin (2021). Adapting and enduring: Lessons learned from

international school educators during COVID-19. Journal of Research in International

Education, 20(2), 114-133.

Jimenez, E. C. (2020). Emotional quotient, work attitude and teaching performance of

secondary school teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 25-35.

Jun, J. S., Kremer, K. P., Marseline, D., Lockett, L., and Kurtz, D. L. (2021). Effective Social Work

online education in response to COVID-19. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 41(5), 520-

Khoiriyah, N., Alfatih, S. A., Munir, M., and Triawan, F. (2021). Component design and strength

analysis of coffin lowering machine for Covid-19 corpse: A problem-based learning.

Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 1(1), 137-150.

Li, Q., Zhou, X., Bostian, and B., Xu, D. (2021). How can we improve online learning at

community colleges? Voices from online instructors and students. Online Learning, 25(3),

-190.

Mugianti, D. S., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Kurniawan, T., and Bilad, M. R. (2022). Analysis of

elementary school students’ leisure time during the Covid-19 pandemic. Indonesian

Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 2(1), 223-228.

Rios, T., Elloitt, M., and Mandernach, B. J. (2018). Efficient instructional strategies for

maximizing online student satisfaction. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), 1-9.

Said, M. (2017). Effective behavior of EFL teachers as perceived by undergraduate students

in Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 50-62.

Saleh, S., and Jing, T. A. (2020). Instructional practices in science education in German and

Malaysian secondary schools: A comparative case study. International Journal of

Instruction, 13(4), 267-282.

Sharoff, L. (2019). Creative and innovative online teaching strategies: Facilitation for active

participation. Journal of Educators Online, 16(2), 1-9.

Sun, H., and Liu, T. (2021). Student-centered online teaching practices in theoretical

mechanics. Higher Education Studies, 11(2), 233-239.

Watson, F. F., Castano Bishop, M., and Ferdinand-James, D. (2017). Instructional strategies to

help online students learn: Feedback from online students. TechTrends, 61(5), 420-427.

Winarni, R. S., and Rasiban, L. M. (2021). Perception of Japanese students in using online

video as a learning media. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology,

(2), 15-16

Yi, Y., and Cornelius, L. F. (2004). Students' perceptions towards the quality of online

education: A qualitative approach. Association for Educational Communications and

Technology, 27(2), 861-877.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-01