Development and Acceptability of Virtual Laboratory in Learning Systematics
Keywords:
ADDIE model, Insects, Systematics, Virtual laboratory, WebsiteAbstract
Virtual laboratory increases learning engagement and may be illustrated through the use of technology and animation media, making it simpler for students to learn and acquire knowledge. This study aimed to develop a Virtual Laboratory In Learning Systematics (ViLIS) website utilizing the Analysis, Design, Development, and Evaluation (ADDE) that would provide users with an array of different interactive activities in various concepts covered in the subject biology in the topic systematics specifically on insects, and provide additional instructional material for teachers. This quantitative study also determined the acceptability level of the developed virtual website. The level of acceptability of the developed virtual laboratory was evaluated by science students and teachers/IT experts based on content, technical, and instructional qualities. The overall results showed that ViLIS satisfied the quality components with an interpretation of “Very High Quality”. It is recommended to conduct an intervention to strengthen the feasibility and effectiveness of the created virtual laboratory.
References
Achuthan, K., Francis, S. P., and Diwakar, S. (2017). Augmented reflective learning and
knowledge retention perceived among students in classrooms involving virtual
laboratories. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2825-2855.
Ahmad, A. (2010). The effect of using a virtual lab on the physics concepts achievement,
acquisition of higher-order thinking skills and motivation toward science learning among
students of the third preparatory class. Scientific Journal of Education, 13(6), 1-46.
Al Balushi, A., Al-Musawi, A., Ambusaidi, A. and Al Hajri, F. (2016). The effectiveness of
interacting with scientific animations in chemistry using mobile devices on grade 12
students' spatial ability and scientific reasoning skills. Journal of Science Education
Technology, 26, 70-81.
Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light
of covid-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16-25.
Aschbacher, P., Li, E., and Roth, E. (2010). Is science me? high school students’ identities,
participation, and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 47(5), 565–582.
Barth, M., and Burandt, S. (2013). Adding the “e-” to learning for sustainable
development: Challenges and innovation. Sustainability, 5, 2609–2622.
Bhardwaj, A. (2016). Importance of education in human life: A holistic approach. International
Journal of Science and Consciousness, 2(2), 23–28.
Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 282–295.
Campos, N., Nogal, M., Caliz, C., and Juan, A. A. (2020). Simulation-based education involving
online and on-campus models in different European universities. International Journal of
Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1–15.
Carlone, H., and Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful
women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A Panacea in the time of covid-19 crisis. Journal of
Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22.
Gamage, K. A. A., Wijesuriya, D. I., Ekanayake, S. Y., Rennie, A. E. W., Lambert, C. G., and
Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery of teaching and laboratory practices:
Continuity of university programmes during covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences.,
(10), 1-9.
Hassan, H. Martinez-Rubio, J. M. Perles, A. Capella, J. V. Dominguez, C., and Albaladejo, J.
(2012). Smartphone-based industrial informatics projects and laboratories. IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(1), 557–566.
Paredes-Labra, J., Siri, I.M., and Oliveira, A. (2018). Preparing public pedagogies with ict: The
case of pesticides and popular education in brazil. Sustainability, 10(10), 3377.
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., and Jovanović,
K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A
review. Computers and Education, 95, 309-327.
Redha, H. (2010). Effective use of virtual lab for enquiry and demonstration in teaching
chemistry on the development of scientific thinking. Journal of Science Education, 13(6),
-106.
Sarabando, C., Cravino, J. P., and Soares, A. A. (2014). Contribution of a computer simulation
to students’ learning of the physics concepts of weight and mass. Procedia Technology,
, 112–121.
Son, J. Y. (2016). Comparing physical, virtual, and hybrid flipped labs for general education
biology. Online Learning, 20(3), 228–243.
Tatli, Z., and Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students'
achievement. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 159-170.
Valderrama-Hernández, R., Sánchez-Carracedo, F., Alcántara Rubio, L., and LimónDomínguez, D. (2020). Methodology to analyze the effectiveness of ESD in a higher
degree in education: A case study. Sustainability, 12(1), 1-27.
Wästberg, B. S., Eriksson, T., Karlsson, G., Sunnerstam, M., Axelsson, M., and Billger, M.
(2019). Design considerations for virtual laboratories: A comparative study of two
virtual laboratories for learning about gas solubility and colour appearance. Education
and Information Technologies, 24, 2059–2080.
Zaid, Y. A., and Alabi, A. O. (2021). Sustaining open educational resources (OER) initiatives in
Nigerian universities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning,
(2), 181–197.
Zajko, K., and Bradaˇc, H. B. (2018). Social franchising model as a scaling strategy for ICT reuse:
A case study of an international franchise. Sustainability, 10(9), 1-28.
